Ten rules for opening a martial arts school


A colleague on the Traditional Fighting Arts Forum recently asked us to list the 10 most important things to consider in opening a martial arts school. Here was my answer:

1. You should be passionate and committed to your martial art and your own progress within that art.

2. You should be qualified to teach at least up to an intermediate (what we call green belt) level. This means you should be thoroughly conversant with technical material to be taught for the first 3-4 years of your students' training. You can be qualified to teach even higher grades - the higher the better. But you have no business opening a dojo unless you have a deep knowledge of the material up to at least an intermediate level. It goes without saying that you should have attained a much higher level than that. But there is a difference in my view between passing a dan grade and being able to teach the material you've just passed. I am also assuming that you will progress further so that you always keep ahead of your students (see point 1)!

3. You should want (and love) to teach.

4. You should be confident but never arrogant.

5. You should preferably have one senior student/associate who is going to assist you.

6. You should find inexpensive premises to hire - premises that can be paid for through the fees of a handful of students.

7. You should conduct every class with the same gusto and energy - whether you have 2 students or 20. You should train by yourself even if no one else shows up.

8. You should keep yourself focused on your own tasks and goals, not what other schools/clubs are doing.

9. You should instil a level of formality in your class to offset its initial small size. The teacher/student relationship needs to be strictly observed during class (and usually outside it). This doesn't preclude you being friendly/friends with students, but it does pose some restrictions on your behaviour with them.

10. You should be honest.

Copyright © 2008 Dejan Djurdjevic

Comments

  1. Jorge Morales-Santo DomingoDecember 3, 2008 at 8:37 AM

    Very good rules to abide by. I'd triple underline no. 9, informality may be fine for black belts but white belts let loose create chaos, a point I tried to make to a sensei friend of mine who ran his dojo too loosy goosey. But I don't quite follow the reasoning behind no. 2.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dan DjurdjevicDecember 3, 2008 at 4:17 PM

    As to point 2...

    I started off by saying "You should be qualified". Then I thought "how qualified?". I decided that you don't have to be qualified to teach 10th Dans in order to open a school. However you need to have at least a "teaching" knowledge of material up to intermediate level. This means you should be thoroughly conversant with technical material to be taught for the first 3-4 years of your students' training. It goes without saying that you should yourself hold a much higher grade than that - but as I said, there is a difference between attaining a grade and being able to teach the material for that grade. I am also assuming that you will progress further so that you always keep ahead of your students!

    As always, thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Colin WeeDecember 16, 2008 at 5:06 PM

    Ten Rules for Opening a Martial Arts School (Colin's Traditional Taekwondo Blog). Colin

    ReplyDelete
  4. Internship In ChinaFebruary 8, 2012 at 2:06 PM

    Hello Friends,
    You are a black belt professional instructor, you represent everything that you are about to suggest a student does to actually earn his way to becoming one of your black belts. Thanks a lot for sharing this...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karate punches vs. boxing punches

Image
Introduction In my article “ Kime: the soul of the karate punch ” I described the essential feature of the karate punch as being “focus” – ie. a combination of minimal deceleration before impact and optimum distancing – usually performed in karate with a straight thrust . Many have, and will continue to, argue that this straight thrust is less powerful than a boxer’s follow-through punches. This is true. But to understand why this does not necessarily mean that the former is less effective we’ll have to examine punching methods – what someone I know calls “delivery systems” – in greater detail. To the extent that karate punching is “less powerful”, I will then go on to examine why this is a tactical choice rather than a necessary failing. Categorising punches In a very general sense karate punches can be divided into 2 kinds: straight line and curved. In boxing, punches can be divided into 2 different categories that overlap with the karate ones, namely: 1. jabs (ie. punches which...
Read more

Zhan zhuang: grounding, structure, intention and qi

Image
Introduction There is a tendency in the Chinese, and increasingly in the Japanese, martial arts to venerate “standing post” training - what is known as zhan zhuang (站樁 - literally “standing like a post”).  In particular the internal arts of China are known for this practise.  Even more particularly, the art of yiquan (意拳 - literally “concept fist”) focuses almost entirely on this as a martial training method. Yiquan, which is also called “da cheng quan” (大成拳 - literally “great achievement boxing”), was developed by xingyiquan master Wang Xiangzhai (26 November 1885 - 12 July 1963).  One of his students was the Taiwan-based martial artist Wang Shujin (a master of xingyiquan, baguazhang and taijiquan who happens to have also been one of my grandmaster Chen Pan Ling's main students). In Japan the yiquan tradition was continued by Kenichi Sawai, founder of the school of taikiken (体気拳 - literally “mind and spirit fist”). So what is the point of “standing post traini...
Read more

Punching: alignment and conditioning

Image
Choson Ninja and the question of "conditioned" knuckles The other day one of my colleagues at the Traditional Fighting Arts Forums alerted me to a fellow who calls himself Choson Ninja. He has a series of videos on Youtube and in this particular one he tells you about the dangers of getting "ugly" knuckles from hand conditioning. The general thrust of his argument is correct: conditioning can lead to deformed and ugly knuckles - especially so if you are doing it incorrectly. Certainly, even moderate makiwara practice will cause you to develop callouses. How "unsightly" these are will depend on how much and how "hard" you do your conditioning. However I disagree with Mr Choson about much of what he says in his video. To begin with, his knuckles are not really that conditioned . Rather, they appear to be damaged from breaks. Mr Choson certainly doesn't have anywhere near the kind of callousing one gets from regular conditioning such as st...
Read more